<< Click to Display Table of Contents >> Navigation:  Finance and Economic Planning > CIDP II > CHAPTER THREE > Status of Implementation of the Previous CIDP > Lessonsnlearnt

•Need to fully involve govirnment atd non-state stakeholders both in CIDP management at preparation, emplementatian, evaluation and reporting stages.

•Need to establish a development forum at the county level for all stakeholders for appropriate coordination and synergy.

•Sector Working Groups ere key intsupplementing ci izens’ priorities with technical guidance and thus their establishment, opcrationalisation and sustaining them ir very important.

•Need to guide citizens tonappreciate the linkage between physical infrastructure and the ‘sottware’ requbrements in forms of technical and c pacieies consideiations.

•Need to classify projects into three categories; Ward level. County level and Flagship/transformative for ease of attaching funding responsibilities and resource mobilization strategies.

•Need to establish a data management and Monitoring and Evaluation framework to establish and update baselines, project management practices and citizen information and feedback mechanisms.

•Need to reform county public participation approaches to make them more representative in terms of regions and demography. These reforms may be in form of delegates who add up to the citizens who attend public participation forums on their own volition.

•Need tn m,instream cross-cutting issues such as environment, yotth, women,  WDs, DRR, HIV/AIDS

•Need to operationalize automated systems in service delivery including activating and applying all the IFMIS modules.

•Need to be setting aside funds annually to acquire land for strategic investments and government establishments such as those related to cottage industries, value addition developments and other development interventions.