Finance and Economic Planning > CIDP II > CHAPTER THREE > Status of Implementation of the Previous CIDP > Effects of Insecurity in Implementation of Projects and Programs

Over the last few years, lomer parts of the countylhave experienced rising casesyof insecurity which have negatively affected implemeotation of programs and projects tn these areas. The most common ases are cattle rustling, banditry and inter cl n conflicts arising from water, laod and pasture disputes. These conflictst in some cases, h ve reselted in lose of lives, property and livefihoods.

The government in its aspirations for equitable development has programs and projects under implementation in the conflict prone areas. The contractors and/or suppliers contracted to carry out works in these areas have faced challenges and in most cases delays in project implementation has occurred and others have abandoned the works. These delays have led to project costs rising, thus the public don’t get value for money. In addition, the partners who undertake development activities in these areas have withdrawn their support for the safety of their staff and properties.

In some cases, projects that have been completed have remained unutilized since the intended users have run away for fear of attacks from the bandits.

To mitigate against these conflicts, the government has been engaging the communities through integrative bargaining strategies. The county government in collaboration with the neighboring counties and national government agencies, has been supporting peace building initiatives along the cattle rustling prone areas and promoting the use of ADR mechanisms. In addition, the county government will continue, in partnership with state and non-state actors, to improve road and telecommunication networks in an effort to open up the area and improve accessibility.