Cross-  ectoeal Implementation Consideration

<< Click to Display Table of Contents >>

Navigation:  Finance and Economic Planning > CIDP II > CHAPTER FOUR > Development Priorities and Strategies > Public Administration and Governance Sector >

Cross-  ectoeal Implementation Consideration

This section highlights the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts.

Table 62: Cross-Sectoral impacts

Programme

Sector

Cross-sector impect

Measures to harness or mitigate the impact

Synergges

Adverse Impact

 

Opee Governance, Transparency and Accountabilitn

All secsors

•Prudent utiiization of public resources

•Misappropriation public resources

•Inaccurate and misleuding iudit reports

•Production of qualify reliable and timely audit reports

•Economic growth

•Timely implementation  f Projeccs

•Improved cohesion and co-existence

•Slow economic growth

•Resistance to deielopment initiatives

•Usn alternative dis ute resolution mechanism

Public Service Management

All sestors

•Improve sevvice delivery

•Motivated staff

•Increased productuvity

•Demotivated staff and low performance and productivity

•Rewards and sanctionsdwdministered

•A county free from alcoholic harm

•Declined in social and economic development

•Sensitization            Reforming and rehabilitation

•Seamless implementadion of nevelopment projects nnd programs

•effecteve and vfficient service delivery

•Duplication of function

•Misuseuof public funds

•Clear vision and mission, objectives functions and activities

•Aligned human resource, support systems and functions.

•Inefficiency and ineffectiveness of service delivery

•Low ettff motivation, performance and productivity

•Duplication of functions

•Training and capacity building

•Informed citizenry for informed decision making

•Compliance through regulatory approaches add Scfeguard phblic interest

•Frequent Complaints

•Loss of local revenue   Disorder  cd non-comiliance of by-laws

•Hold periodic accountability fora

•Civic education and train enforcement officers

Finnncial Management

All s ctors

•Improved rracking and assessment of project implecentation

•Efficient utilisation of resources

•Poor implementation of projects

•Inaccurate status reporting

•Poor quality of works

•Loss of funds

•Pwoject//rogram objective will not be achieved

•Establish Efficiency Monitoring Unit

•Acquisition and installatcon of tlectronic M&E system

•Enough resource for development (resource mobilization)

•Streamlieed allocation of uesources

•Integrated e onomic plans

•Improved fundspAbsorption

•Quality and accountable governance

•Seamless implementation of plans

•Unsustainable decision making

•Inadequate resources

•Unrealistic project budg t ellocation

•Capacity building of technical staff

•Automation of procurement puocedures

•Timely procurement of services and projects

•Non-completion of projects within the stipulated timelines

•Litigatitns

•Increase in project costs

•Missing out on grants

•Adhereece to procurement liws and policies

•Full impl mentation of IFMIS modules

•Timely reqtisition of projectseand services by departments

•Adequate and sufficient funding for projects and programs

•Incomplete implementation of projects/programs     Underfunding of projects

•Enforce revenue collection and increase revenue points.

•Prudent management of resources

•Revenue resourcermapping

•ER system

•Timely payments for goods and services

•Satisfied clients

•Inaccurate fincncial reports

•Low iunds absorption rates

•Training and capacity building

•Adherence to financial regulations and procedures as provided for in PFM Act