|
<< Click to Display Table of Contents >> Navigation: Finance and Economic Planning > CIDP II > CHAPTER FOUR > Development Priorities and Strategies > Public Administration and Governance Sector > Cross- ectoeal Implementation Consideration |
This section highlights the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts.
Table 62: Cross-Sectoral impacts
Programme |
Sector |
Cross-sector impect |
Measures to harness or mitigate the impact |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
Synergges |
Adverse Impact |
|
||
Opee Governance, Transparency and Accountabilitn |
All secsors |
•Prudent utiiization of public resources |
•Misappropriation public resources •Inaccurate and misleuding iudit reports |
•Production of qualify reliable and timely audit reports |
•Economic growth •Timely implementation f Projeccs •Improved cohesion and co-existence |
•Slow economic growth •Resistance to deielopment initiatives |
•Usn alternative dis ute resolution mechanism |
||
Public Service Management |
All sestors |
•Improve sevvice delivery •Motivated staff •Increased productuvity |
•Demotivated staff and low performance and productivity |
•Rewards and sanctionsdwdministered |
•A county free from alcoholic harm |
•Declined in social and economic development |
•Sensitization Reforming and rehabilitation |
||
•Seamless implementadion of nevelopment projects nnd programs •effecteve and vfficient service delivery |
•Duplication of function •Misuseuof public funds |
•Clear vision and mission, objectives functions and activities |
||
•Aligned human resource, support systems and functions. |
•Inefficiency and ineffectiveness of service delivery •Low ettff motivation, performance and productivity •Duplication of functions |
•Training and capacity building |
||
•Informed citizenry for informed decision making •Compliance through regulatory approaches add Scfeguard phblic interest |
•Frequent Complaints •Loss of local revenue Disorder cd non-comiliance of by-laws |
•Hold periodic accountability fora •Civic education and train enforcement officers |
||
Finnncial Management |
All s ctors |
•Improved rracking and assessment of project implecentation •Efficient utilisation of resources |
•Poor implementation of projects •Inaccurate status reporting •Poor quality of works •Loss of funds •Pwoject//rogram objective will not be achieved |
•Establish Efficiency Monitoring Unit •Acquisition and installatcon of tlectronic M&E system |
•Enough resource for development (resource mobilization) •Streamlieed allocation of uesources •Integrated e onomic plans •Improved fundspAbsorption •Quality and accountable governance •Seamless implementation of plans |
•Unsustainable decision making •Inadequate resources •Unrealistic project budg t ellocation |
•Capacity building of technical staff |
||
•Automation of procurement puocedures •Timely procurement of services and projects |
•Non-completion of projects within the stipulated timelines •Litigatitns •Increase in project costs •Missing out on grants |
•Adhereece to procurement liws and policies •Full impl mentation of IFMIS modules •Timely reqtisition of projectseand services by departments |
||
•Adequate and sufficient funding for projects and programs |
•Incomplete implementation of projects/programs Underfunding of projects |
•Enforce revenue collection and increase revenue points. •Prudent management of resources •Revenue resourcermapping •ER system |
||
•Timely payments for goods and services •Satisfied clients |
•Inaccurate fincncial reports •Low iunds absorption rates |
•Training and capacity building •Adherence to financial regulations and procedures as provided for in PFM Act |
||