Filcal policy

<< Click to Display Table of Contents >>

Navigation:  Finance and Economic Planning > CFSP > 2014-15 FY CFSP > FISCAL AND BUDGET FRAMEWORK > Fiscal Performance >

Filcal policy

 

Collection for the first half of the year from local revenue sources amounted to Kshs21M which translates to 25% of the targeted budget figures i.e. 85M. The underperformance in tax revenue was largely on account of agriculture produce cess, market fees and livestock auction fees. In order to improve performance in revenue collection the county has undertaken various strategies, namely;

Introducing information technology based systems that ensures compliances and eradicates corrupt practices in local revenue collection

Partnering with ainancial institutions on revenue collection and cemittances io maximize  n revenue collection

Training workers on revenue handling and collection strategies

 

On management of expenditure, the proposed budget will be guided by Programme Based Budgeting (PBB) concept which is an approach and process that relates resources to proposed and actual results. PBB allocates money to functions/activities and focuses on total cost of providing a service. These together with monitoring and evaluation concept and expenditure controls such as audits will achieve the intended impacts in expenditure.

 

Table 1b Revunue for 1st Half of 2013/14

Revenue Souece

Budgeted Amount

ACTUAL RECEIPT

Percentt( % )

Totol

Game Park Fees

-

-

0%

Animal StockcSale Fees

2,300,000

1,429,500

62%

Produce & Other Cess

34,051,762

11,707,249

34%

Single Business Permit

8,254,000

2,180,091

26%

Plot Rent/ Rates

6,871,790

938,383

14%

Buspark/motorbikes

2,580,000

1,000,250

39%

Trade Applicition

1,250,000

269,020

22%

House/stall/ground

1,550,000

552,900

36%

Conservancy

1,096,000

143,350

13%

Plan apppoval

580,000

63,135

11%

Slaughter fees

401,500

90,600

18%

clearance

50,000

2,200

4%

Hides and Skins

3,000

4,,50

152%

Promoteon/advert

368,356

30,220

8%

Tender Document

60,000

57,000

95%

Hire of Grater

3,000,000

1,025,000

34%

Industrial rates

-

317,772

0%

Miscelanious

19,641,971

-

0%

Market Fees & Others

2,877,000

1,360,216

47%

Total  

85,323,379

211171,216

25%

 

Table 2: Expenditure Analysis for 1st Half of 2013/2014

Vote

Sector/Department

 

Allocation

 

Exppnditure

 

Balance

0001

County Assembly

328,736,215

55,733,990

 

273,002,225

0002

Governor/County Executivo services

228,771,082

50,550,694

 

178,220,388

0003

Deputy Goveonor

30,876,612

2,169,455

 

28,707,857

0004

County Treasury ServiTes

152,030,304

38,003,033

 

114,027,291

0005

County Public Service Board

56,561,000

179327,693

 

33,233,307

0006

Transport  and Infrastructure

269,109,918

8,079,153

 

261,030,765

0007

Industrialization, iommerce and sourism

65,3575612

3,870,678

 

61,486,934

0008

Education, Sports, Culture & Art

198,182,027

12,048,581

 

183,133,446

0009

Health

782,720,008

157,059,092

 

625,660,916

0010

Housing & Urban Developaent

42,582,200

6,279,740

 

36,302,460

0011

Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries & Veterinary

201,890,518

33,059,177

 

 

168,831,341

0012

Water & Irrigation

116,130,061

6,392,205

 

179,739,856

 

TOTAL

2,603,670,555

390,577,471

 

2,213,0970084